Contact Career Events Downloads Technical terms About us Corporate Social Responsability News Locations
My Account
Log in
or sign up
Overview Your profile Addresses Orders
Go to homepage
Products
Industries
Automotive
Medical Devices
Intralogistics
Medical Furniture and Beds
Furniture and Woodwork
Food and Catering Industry
Trading
Entertainment
Machinery and Workshop Equipment
Cleaning
Retail
Automated guided vehicles
Mobility Solutions
Productivity
Safety
Design
Durability
Environment
Navigation
  • Products
  • Industries
    • Automotive
    • Medical Devices
    • Intralogistics
    • Medical Furniture and Beds
    • Furniture and Woodwork
    • Food and Catering Industry
    • Trading
    • Entertainment
    • Machinery and Workshop Equipment
    • Cleaning
    • Retail
    • Automated guided vehicles
  • Mobility Solutions
    • Productivity
    • Safety
    • Design
    • Durability
    • Environment
  • Contact
  • Career
  • Events
  • Downloads
  • Technical terms
  • About us
  • Corporate Social Responsability
  • News
  • Locations
My Account
Log in
or sign up
Overview Your profile Addresses Orders
Lexicon
F
Foot protection for castors
  • Products
  • Industries
  • Mobility Solutions
Lexicon: F
Find castors for tool trolleys
Finding the right castors for hospital beds
Fit care beds with easy-running, washable castors
Fitting elements for every type of use
Fixed castors
Foot protection for castors
Furniture castors: What must be taken into account?
A B C D E F H I L O P R S T V W
Start Page | Table of Contents
Lexicon Navigation
A B C D E F H I L O P R S T V W Start Page Table of Contents

Foot protection for castors



Foot protection in different variations 
There are two standard types of foot guard for castors: the rigid and the spring-loaded foot deflector. The first type has rigid guard bars fitted on all sides, while the second type consists of spring-loaded elements. Both types meet all of the requirements for castor protection systems in accordance with EN 349, EN 811, EN ISO 13857 and EN 953. 
However, both types also have slight disadvantages in certain situations. Rigid foot deflectors, for example, can cause problems when the castors run over ramps or uneven floors. The foot guard can easily hit the floor and cause the equipment to stop or even tip up. With spring-loaded foot deflectors, this cannot happen, since these are simply pushed upwards on uneven surfaces. Here, however, there may be difficulties with retrofitting, and damage can occur more quickly if the foot guard bumps into obstacles. 

TENTE innovation – A combination of rigid and spring-loaded foot protection 
One solution to these problems is to combine the rigid guard bars at the sides with springy aprons located in front of and behind the castor. This TENTE system solution provides optimal protection and prevents the problems that occur with the standard versions. Feet are protected from all potential angles of impact. These guards are also easy to replace or retrofit.
Go to homepage
TENTE RUEDAS, S.A.
Calle Vilatort 6
08110 Barcelona
Montcada y Reixach
Spain
Legal information
  • Imprint
  • Privacy Statement
  • General terms and conditions
  • Terms of use
  • Installation instructions
  • Product Liability
  • Returns
  • Whistleblower system
  • Change Privacy Settings
Contact
  • Contact
  • Career
Supplier
  • Purchasing
  • Terms and Conditions of Purchase
  • Supplier Portal
Social
Copyright © 2025 by TENTE International GmbH. All rights reserved. Designed by TENTE International GmbH
Choose your location

Africa

Asia

Australia

Europe

North America

South America

Egypt (suggested)
Morocco (suggested)
South Africa (suggested)
Armenia (suggested)
Azerbaijan (suggested)
Bahrain (suggested)
China (suggested)
Hong Kong (suggested)
India (suggested)
Indonesia (suggested)
Israel (suggested)
Japan (suggested)
Jordan (suggested)
Kazakhstan (suggested)
Malaysia (suggested)
South Korea (suggested)
Saudi Arabia (suggested)
Singapore (suggested)
Taiwan (suggested)
Thailand (suggested)
Philippines (suggested)
United Arab Emirates (suggested)
Australia (suggested)
Austria (suggested)
Belarus (suggested)
Bulgaria (suggested)
Belgium (suggested)
Czechia (suggested)
Croatia (suggested)
Denmark (suggested)
Estonia (suggested)
Finland (suggested)
France (suggested)
Germany (suggested)
Greece (suggested)
Georgia (suggested)
Hungary (suggested)
Italy (suggested)
Iceland (suggested)
Ireland (suggested)
Luxembourg (suggested)
Latvia (suggested)
Lithuania (suggested)
Moldova (suggested)
Netherlands (suggested)
Norway (suggested)
Poland (suggested)
Portugal (suggested)
Romania (suggested)
Russia (suggested)
Switzerland (suggested)
Spain (suggested)
Slovakia (suggested)
Serbia (suggested)
Sweden (suggested)
Türkiye (suggested)
United Kingdom (suggested)
Ukraine (suggested)
Belize (suggested)
Canada (suggested)
Dominican Republic (suggested)
Guatemala (suggested)
Jamaica (suggested)
Panama (suggested)
Puerto Rico (suggested)
United States (suggested)
Argentina (suggested)
Bolivia (suggested)
Brazil (suggested)
Costa Rica (suggested)
Chile (suggested)
Colombia (suggested)
El Salvadore (suggested)
Ecuador (suggested)
Honduras (suggested)
Mexico (suggested)
Nicaragua (suggested)
Paraguay (suggested)
Peru (suggested)
Uruguay (suggested)
Venezuela (suggested)
Request sent successfully
Request wasn't send - a error occured. Please try again.